As reported earlier, Ruskell said the team made the move in large part because they drafted linebacker Aaron Curry, and along with the rest of the rookies they drafted and free agents they signed, the need the cap room for flexibility.
However, Ruskell did say the team is still negotiating with Hill, and that the 26-year-old linebacker indicated through a conversation with Mora that Hill still wants to remain a Seahawk.
Todd France, Hill’s agent, confirmed Ruskell’s comments in this report from Associated Press reporter Gregg Bell.
But if things do not work out, Mora said he’s has faith that Will Herring, David Hawthorne or D.D. Lewis could step in an ably fill the position.
If the Seahawks lose Hill in free agency, they’re likely to receive some type of draft compensation next year in return.
ESPN’s John Clayton explains that process here.
Ruskell went on to say the franchise tag actually hindered instead of helped negotiations, which he explains below
“That’s kind of the negative part of the franchise tag,” Ruskell said. “It doesn’t promote getting a deal done. It kind of dis-promotes it, because of the exorbitant price tag that’s on it.
“People really don’t know what to do. The tag has not always been a positive on, for us and for a lot of teams. It’s a strange tool. You go into it thinking that if you do this, then this will happen, and quite often that does not happen, for whatever the tag is. I think both sides would agree to that, that it didn’t promote getting a deal done in a timely fashion, so that Leroy could be here to learn this new offense, which is what we wanted. We were hoping that is what would happen. It did not. We’re trying this now.”
The Seahawks are bringing in Curry this morning, so I’ll have a report soon after the press conference.
Tags: Cap Room, curry, D Lewis, David Hawthorne, ESPN, franchise tag, free agents, John Clayton, Leroy Hill, Linebacker, Mora, Negotiations, price tag, Rookies, Seahawk, Tim Ruskell, Todd France, Will Herring
Fair Use Notice This website may at times present copyrighted material, the use of which might not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available in an effort to advance understandings of democratic, economic, environmental, human rights, political, scientific, and social justice issues, among others. The author believes that this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U. S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles published on this website are distributed without profit for research and informational purposes. In most instances a link is placed to originator of Article and it is never expressly mentioned as written by, we use published by certain entities who write or publish for this said Blog..