The Seattle Seahawks continued to talk to Vincent Jackson’s representatives on Saturday, but “the price was too high,” according to a source familiar with the dealings.
That is, the price Jackson was asking was still too high.
I don’t know exactly what that price is, but Clark Judge from CBSSports.com talked to one NFC general manager who indicated it was darn near the price reported two weeks ago that was a week later disputed by one of Jackson’s agents.
Judge cites the unnamed G.M. saying the Chargers started by asking for the same thing they’d essentially been asking for all offseason — first-round and third-round picks — but that price dropped to “almost anything.”
The Chargers placed a first-and-third tender on Jackson back in March. That gave Jackson a $3.268 million one-year deal with the Chargers and the right to negotiate with other teams. Had another team signed Jackson, it would have also had to give the Chargers those two draft picks (or another negotiated price).
That did not happen, and Jackson and left tackle Marcus McNeill, also unhappy with his contract status, had their tenders reduced on June 15 by more than $2.5 million. Both are believed to be willing to sit out the season.
Seahawks 12th Man Army has now gone mobile! Go to http://www.noticeorange.com/r/Seahawks12thManArmy to get an app for your phone. It's free and it has alerts so that you'll know whenever Seahawks 12th Man Army has anything new. What could be better?Tags: 5 Million, Chargers, Contract Status, Draft Picks, Marcus Mcneill, nfc, SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, Sit, Tenders, vincent jackson
Fair Use Notice This website may at times present copyrighted material, the use of which might not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available in an effort to advance understandings of democratic, economic, environmental, human rights, political, scientific, and social justice issues, among others. The author believes that this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U. S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles published on this website are distributed without profit for research and informational purposes. In most instances a link is placed to originator of Article and it is never expressly mentioned as written by, we use published by certain entities who write or publish for this said Blog..