The Seattle Seahawks made history last season by winning the NFC West with a 7-9 record, the first team to ever win their division with a losing record. They earned a playoff berth while the New York Giants and Tampa Bay Buccaneers missed the NFC postseason cut despite 10-6 records.
The NFL has bigger things to worry about than reseeding the playoffs to prevent another division winner from qualifying with a losing record.
The Atlanta Falcons’ Rich McKay, chairman of the competition committee, told reporters during a conference call Wednesday the issue could be losing support. As a result, the issue is off the agenda for the 2011 owners’ meetings, which begin next week.
The Giants and Bucs had reason to be frustrated with their fates last season. Both teams defeated Seattle convincingly during the regular season. Both teams finished three games ahead of Seattle in the overall NFC standings.
My feeling, however, was that winning a division should still count for something significant — a guaranteed home playoff game, in this case — or else why have divisions at all? Also, why revamp the playoff system in reaction to something so historically rare?
It’s a question that could beg for revisiting in the future. Realignment into four-team divisions has increased the likelihood that losing teams will prevail.
As noted last month, the NFL produced four losing teams within the division on four occasions between 1990 and 2001, the years immediately prior to realignment. Those divisions had more than four teams, however.http://www.noticeorange.com/r/Seahawks12thManArmy to get an app for your phone. It's free and it has alerts so that you'll know whenever Seahawks 12th Man Army has anything new. What could be better?
Tags: Atlanta Falcons, Bucs, Competition Committee, Conference Call, Division Winner, ESPN, Fates, Home Playoff Game, Likelihood, Logic, New York Giants, Nfc Standings, Nfc West, Nfl, Playoff Berth, Realignment, SEATTLE SEAHAWKS, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Team Divisions, Three Games
Fair Use Notice This website may at times present copyrighted material, the use of which might not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available in an effort to advance understandings of democratic, economic, environmental, human rights, political, scientific, and social justice issues, among others. The author believes that this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U. S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles published on this website are distributed without profit for research and informational purposes. In most instances a link is placed to originator of Article and it is never expressly mentioned as written by, we use published by certain entities who write or publish for this said Blog..